Recently in Reports Category
The total difference was only 298 renewals, but since it affected the total annual figures, we updated all of the monthly spreadsheets.
If you have questions, please contact Gerri at the OWLS office.
- 2009 OWLSnet Partnership Report
- Rental vs. Retail DVD introduction
- Brainstorming 'bout Browsing discussion group report
- Holds Analysis Charts:
- holds placed
- holds placed monthly
- holds placed quarterly
- ILLs quarterly
- Circulation quarterly
- Holds/ILLs/Circulation
- TNS project costs - updated costs for OWLSnet libraries
I should have known better than to try to implement the new Search Shelves reports with barcodes at the same time that Patty is breaking in her new PC. My apologies for the confusion - I believe that tomorrow the reports will be correct. Third time's the charm, right?
The good news is that this will not affect any of the monthly reports for January or February of 2009. However, if you keep track of these daily numbers, you can get the real numbers for Friday and Saturday by using the hourly circulation stats in the *old* Web Management reports. (Please let Laura or me know if you need help with this.)
Just a reminder - the circulation numbers in the daily circ activity reports are not official numbers and will not match the numbers in the monthly circulation reports, or the numbers provided for the state annual report. The daily circ numbers are best used as a gauge of activity in your library.
Innovative assures me that this will not affect the monthly numbers, and that the problem is no longer occurring. Also, since this issue has happened before, they are referring it to the programming department to investigate further.
If you have any questions about this, please don't hesitate to call.
Both of the Checkouts and Renewals reports reflect an
accurate total number of checkouts. Unfortunately,
municipality and renewal
detail for April 15th is missing, and had to be estimated. Checkouts that could not be accurately assigned
to a municipality were assigned to the municipality that checks out the
most
items at your library. For example, the
checkouts
for Algoma on April 15th that could not be assigned to a
specific
municipality were all assigned to the city of Algoma. Renewals
that could not be assigned to a
specific municipality were added to the municipalities that renew the
most
items online. For most libraries, these
estimated numbers are very small, and generally range from 2% to 5% of
the total
checkouts and renewals for the month.
These are the most accurate numbers that we are able to provide, and these will match the official circ numbers we’ll provide at the end of the year for the annual report.
Interlibrary Loan Lender/Borrower
The Interlibrary Loan statistics are missing all data from
April 1st through April 3rd. We
were not able to retrieve this
information, so are posting the statistics as-is. Please
keep in mind that while three days are
missing from the statistics, they are missing for all libraries, so the
stats
are still useful in comparing lender/borrower numbers and looking at
lender/borrower ratios for individual libraries.
The Web Management Circulation reports are missing all data
from April 1st through April 3rd.
(The one exception is the Hourly Circ report. The
April Hourly Circ
statistics are correct for the month of April.) Because of this, data
from any
of these reports will not match the data from the Checkouts and
Renewals
reports posted on the OWLSnet statistics page.
Currently, Appleton and Door County libraries are receiving this report. Please call the OWLS office if you would like to start receiving this report.
- New patrons report
- Short Loan List
- Discarded Items Statistics/Report
Since this report was originally mailed either to the director of the library or the person responsible for statistics, we used the email address of the person who is currently receiving the report. If you wish to change who the report is emailed to, please contact Patty Hankey.
Patty has reposted the Should be Short Loan Report again after we discovered a problem with the report. The report had a problem with item status - some items that should have been on the report were not included, and other items were included that shouldn't have been. I apologize for this - I think it's fixed now and the problem should not re-occur. However, should you notice anything not-quite-right about this report (or any others) please don't hesitate to contact me.
